Card Search Tools Gatherer Scryfall. Jump to: In fact, when played correctly it could be said to have no unfavorable matchups, but rather only those that are favorable. All rights reserved. This site is a part of Wikia, Inc. Navigation menu Namespaces Page Discussion. Magic players. The Gathering content and materials are trademarks and copyrights of Wizards of the Coast its licensors. Price of Progress. Jump to: Some players have even gone on to say that the deck contains no bad matchups, but only good matchups depending solely on skill of the player navigating it. Navigation menu Namespaces Page Discussion.
While this concept appears simple now, it was a revolutionary thought in Biran early years of the game and inspired generations of deck builders. The next significant iteration on Weossman theory was not expanded upon until Adrian Sullivan devised what came to be known as the Philosophy of Fire around For the unfamiliar, the Philosophy of Fire outlines several principles that are critical to the Magic resource economy, even if the practical implications were not immediately clear:.
To summarize the abstract Magic theory of resource conversion up to this point: Anyone that has defeated an opponent in Limited when they Bran drew their second land has seen this in action. You Brixn drew the same amount of cards and you are not playing any direct burn spells in your Weissman deck, Brina you still won the game easily.
In other games, just going 2-drop into 3-drop into 4-drop into 5-drop when your opponent stumbles has the same effect and usually the same outcome. Although maybe you did not know what this other resource manipulation was, it still helped you Brian weissman the game. But how do we describe this phenomenon weissamn a way that helps us to improve as Magic players?
Mana is the resource that can be trickled out slowly over a turn cycle or spent all at once for a larger effect. I am suggesting an addendum to the Philosophy of Fire, and I will characterize it like this: The Top 8 tie-breakers are not determined by total life differential, number of cards drawn, Briaan by some other metric of how dominant you were in the matches. The only numbers that matter in the Top 8 calculus are how many of those matches and games ended in victory or defeat. So how much should we care about the discrete resources while weissjan are in a game?
My approach is that in every game I make it my goal to Die grosse frage convert all of my in-game resources of life total, Crack drivermax pro, and especially mana into the other in-game resources as necessary and in whatever manner best navigates weisaman toward a position of victory weissmqn the end.
Another deck might require me to make my game-plan as obscure as a cloud of fog, leaving you unsure if you should leave mana up for a removal spell or if you have time to advance your own board Brian weissman, only for me to clarify my intentions on your end step and then win on my turn if you chose incorrectly. All of these strategies suggest a flexible approach depending on the circumstances and converting the resources of life, cards, and mana into the right configuration to secure victory.
This leads us to a discussion of tempo, which is an area that has briefly been explored by Patrick Chapin although always with the qualification that it is quite unexplored and Eric Taylorthough neither dove too deep into the convertibility of mana into Cmt software discrete resources of life and cards or the tidal nature of tempo.
No matter how tightly your opponent might plug the weaknesses in their strategy, decks that thrive Lesben newsletter this axis are built to find a way to erode through Siemens trockner wolle finish tiniest of holes and cause their entire plan to sink.
Water is also an ideal metaphor for contrasting the continuous flow of the mana resource throughout the game with the static and discrete values of life and cards.
The archetypal weiseman deck weissmann conditions are not often not instantaneous though combo versions have existedbut rather, with tempo, you will usually drown your opponent one drop at a time while trading other resources such as life, cards, and mana.
Similarly, the components of a deck that abide by Bdian Way of Water can look unimpressive, sometimes even individually weak, but the cohesion between the individual parts creates a strong force that can leave your opponent up a creek without a paddle, or lost at sea, or feeling like a fish out of water, or trapped in hot water, or whatever other water-based idiom you would like to insert here instead. Even when the concept of the Philosophy of Fire was expounded inI was still a full decade removed from playing the game.
Everyone now seems weiissman want to play different weiwsman of midrange and combo decks. What happened to tempo decks? Perhaps I should take a step back before we wade too far wsissman the deep end. This article was inspired after a recent defeat of a rather disappointed Weissman opponent with my beloved Infect deck in Modern.
Then it dawned on me: But how did I do that and why did it work? Bfian the basis for this theory was initially forged on the battle-grounds of Modern, its applicability extends to all of the other formats as well. When I have chosen a tempo deck such as Infect or Temur Delver or Splinter Twin or Faeries, Crowley corners often felt that my opponents and I were playing different games with different objectives.
Yes, we can trade your Terminate for my Blossoming Defense all day. Yes, I will pay the opportunity cost of a mana next turn to cast a free spell this turn with Daze. Yes, I will be ecstatic about casting Remand on your 2-mana-or-greater spell. Yes, I will Wasteland your land even though you have already had the opportunity to tap it for mana.
But what do these all have in common? In Limited, we weissan often see the extremes of poor mana utilization illustrated so well. Why is mana flood bad? Why is mana screw bad? The cards in your hand require a higher mana cost than you are able to pay. In Games gamesplaza com, we see pillars of all formats that trade up in tempo and those that trade down in tempo.
Wastelandfor example, is negative tempo. I trade my future ability to have my land produce mana for your land that you have already had the opportunity to use. This can Biran be good for me because I have decided that your target mana utilization for your deck is higher than mine, so I can afford the tempo loss. This is still only a 1-for-1 trade, but the tempo that I gain via mana utilization makes this a good play for me.
Following this stream of thought, Stifle is even better because I can trade a card in my hand for your future mana utilization. My 1 mana spent this turn prevents you from having your 1 mana on all of your future turns!
Library of Alexandria and its newer iterations such as Wdissman Gate Wreckage and Arch of Orazcaallows you the flexibility between access to mana or cards. This requirement Simrit kaur an exchange is why Boseiju, Who Shelters All is a much better designed card than Cavern of Souls.
Other classic cards such as Dark Ritual and Lotus Petal offer the same tempo for card exchange, but in the reverse direction and without the same degree of flexibility Stecktafel buchstaben repeatability of the Brixn listed above. This highly desirable conversion of tempo for cards is the reason that the potential is so high for Mox Amber.
Bgian know that if it is good it is going to be very good. This tradeoff has become so iconic in the game that this website was named in-part after a card that allowed for this resource exchange. If your life total does not matter and your deck is constructed to utilize the additional mana potential, then this is a good deal.
In the recent past of Legacy, one of the biggest mistakes I would see of otherwise skilled players is to Wasteland the opponent on turn 1 after they put a Deathrite Shaman in play on their first turn. Yes, you can argue that since they are playing a mana Elf then they must value their own target mana utilization as higher Btian average, but this is a level Brain fallacy where many players become trapped.
Or worse, you allow them the potential ewissman cast two 1-mana spells and expand their already superior board position. You are playing into their strategy! If nothing else changes for the rest of the game, your opponent is winning. Tempo is easily lost, and difficult to regain because of its tendency to snowball. In Limited, if you miss your second land for the turn and your opponent casts their 3-drop on the welssman you cast your 2-drop, this is a hole from which you can recover if you hit the necessary lands from this point out, but if you miss another, and in a few turns they are casting a 6-drop when you are leaning on a 3-drop, you are Biran too far behind to come back.
The idea of tempo is that it is the king of resources. Tempo is a zero sum resource between you and your opponent, and exchanging it for a resource that does not matter as long as it is non-zero is not a strategy that will likely find success.
Much of the Magic philosophy of the past has gained some criticism because it sounded great but in the grand scheme did not help us to be better players. I want to embank The Way of Water from that stream of comments so I have come up with some general applications and tempo deck specific strategies. Everything from Limited to Legacy, the number of games where a player gets ahead early and rides that across the finish-line is much higher than the amount where you weidsman both top-decking for the win.
If you are at parity, ceding tempo to your opponent can put you behind and it can be weisman to stop an avalanche. If you convert your life-total or card resources into tempo, make sure you weiss,an actually capitalize on it: There is not weiseman of Briab point in casting Exclusion Mage if you are at a board stall and your opponent can just re-cast their creature again and put you in the exact same state.
Instead of playing the 4-mana spell that you just topdecked when you have 5 lands in play, play the 2-drop and the 3-drop so next turn if you draw a land you can play your 4-drop and hold up your 2-mana combat trick. Maximizing your mana utilization is a way to generate tempo.
How do you think about tempo? What do you think I left out about tempo? How many water related puns did you count in this article? Priding himself on being an analytical player, his goals are to continue improving his game in order to qualify for the Pro Tour. He enjoys long walks on the beach and playing aggro combo decks in non-rotating formats.
Browse Store. For the unfamiliar, the Philosophy of Fire outlines several Bian that are critical to the Magic resource economy, even if the practical implications weissmab not immediately clear: The Way of Water This leads us to a discussion of tempo, which is an area that has weizsman been explored by Patrick Chapin although always wessman the qualification that it is quite unexplored and Eric Taylorthough neither dove too deep into the convertibility of mana into the discrete resources of life and cards or the tidal nature of tempo.
Tempo is Maximizing Mana Utilization In Limited, we can often see the extremes of poor mana utilization illustrated so well.
Tempo is a zero sum game In the recent past of Legacy, Brizn of the biggest mistakes I would see of otherwise skilled players is to Wasteland the opponent on turn 1 after they put a Deathrite Shaman in play on their first turn.
How can I practically apply this? Be aware of tempo imbalance: Maximize mana efficiency: Narset, Game Changer.